aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2026-04-07btrfs: inhibit extent buffer writeback to prevent COW amplificationLeo Martins1-0/+3
Inhibit writeback on COW'd extent buffers for the lifetime of the transaction handle, preventing background writeback from setting BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN and causing unnecessary re-COW. COW amplification occurs when background writeback flushes an extent buffer that a transaction handle is still actively modifying. When lock_extent_buffer_for_io() transitions a buffer from dirty to writeback, it sets BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN, marking the block as having been persisted to disk at its current bytenr. Once WRITTEN is set, should_cow_block() must either COW the block again or overwrite it in place, both of which are unnecessary overhead when the buffer is still being modified by the same handle that allocated it. By inhibiting background writeback on actively-used buffers, WRITTEN is never set while a transaction handle holds a reference to the buffer, avoiding this overhead entirely. Add an atomic_t writeback_inhibitors counter to struct extent_buffer, which fits in an existing 6-byte hole without increasing struct size. When a buffer is COW'd in btrfs_force_cow_block(), call btrfs_inhibit_eb_writeback() to store the eb in the transaction handle's writeback_inhibited_ebs xarray (keyed by eb->start), take a reference, and increment writeback_inhibitors. The function handles dedup (same eb inhibited twice by the same handle) and replacement (different eb at the same logical address). Allocation failure is graceful: the buffer simply falls back to the pre-existing behavior where it may be written back and re-COW'd. Also inhibit writeback in should_cow_block() when COW is skipped, so that every transaction handle that reuses an already-COW'd buffer also inhibits its writeback. Without this, if handle A COWs a block and inhibits it, and handle B later reuses the same block without inhibiting, handle A's uninhibit on end_transaction leaves the buffer unprotected while handle B is still using it. This ensures all handles that access a COW'd buffer contribute to the inhibitor count, and the buffer remains protected until the last handle releases it. In lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), when writeback_inhibitors is non-zero and the writeback mode is WB_SYNC_NONE, skip the buffer. WB_SYNC_NONE is used by the VM flusher threads for background and periodic writeback, which are the only paths that cause COW amplification by opportunistically writing out dirty extent buffers mid-transaction. Skipping these is safe because the buffers remain dirty in the page cache and will be written out at transaction commit time. WB_SYNC_ALL must always proceed regardless of writeback_inhibitors. This is required for correctness in the fsync path: btrfs_sync_log() writes log tree blocks via filemap_fdatawrite_range() (WB_SYNC_ALL) while the transaction handle that inhibited those same blocks is still active. Without the WB_SYNC_ALL bypass, those inhibited log tree blocks would be silently skipped, resulting in an incomplete log on disk and corruption on replay. btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() also uses WB_SYNC_ALL via filemap_fdatawrite_range(); for that path, inhibitors are already cleared beforehand, but the bypass ensures correctness regardless. Uninhibit in __btrfs_end_transaction() before atomic_dec(num_writers) to prevent a race where the committer proceeds while buffers are still inhibited. Also uninhibit in btrfs_commit_transaction() before writing and in cleanup_transaction() for the error path. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: headers cleanup to remove unnecessary local includesQu Wenruo1-4/+0
[BUG] When I tried to remove btrfs_bio::fs_info and use btrfs_bio::inode to grab the fs_info, the header "btrfs_inode.h" is needed to access the full btrfs_inode structure. Then btrfs will fail to compile. [CAUSE] There is a recursive including chain: "bio.h" -> "btrfs_inode.h" -> "extent_map.h" -> "compression.h" -> "bio.h" That recursive including is causing problems for btrfs. [ENHANCEMENT] To reduce the risk of recursive including: - Remove unnecessary local includes from btrfs headers Either the included header is pulled in by other headers, or is completely unnecessary. - Remove btrfs local includes if the header only requires a pointer In that case let the implementing C file to pull the required header. This is especially important for headers like "btrfs_inode.h" which pulls in a lot of other btrfs headers, thus it's a mine field of recursive including. - Remove unnecessary temporary structure definition Either if we have included the header defining the structure, or completely unused. Now including "btrfs_inode.h" inside "bio.h" is completely fine, although "btrfs_inode.h" still includes "extent_map.h", but that header only includes "fs.h", no more chain back to "bio.h". Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: move abort_should_print_stack() to transaction.hFilipe Manana1-2/+16
The function abort_should_print_stack() is declared in transaction.h but its definition is in ctree.c, which doesn't make sense since ctree.c is the btree implementation and the function is related to the transaction code. Move its definition into transaction.h as an inline function since it's a very short and trivial function, and also add the 'btrfs_' prefix into its name. This change also reduces the module size. Before this change: $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko text data bss dec hex filename 1783148 161137 16920 1961205 1decf5 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko After this change: $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko text data bss dec hex filename 1782126 161045 16920 1960091 1de89b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: correct typos in multiple comments across various filesShen Lichuan1-1/+1
Fix some confusing spelling errors that were currently identified, the details are as follows: block-group.c: 2800: uncompressible ==> incompressible extent-tree.c: 3131: EXTEMT ==> EXTENT extent_io.c: 3124: utlizing ==> utilizing extent_map.c: 1323: ealier ==> earlier extent_map.c: 1325: possiblity ==> possibility fiemap.c: 189: emmitted ==> emitted fiemap.c: 197: emmitted ==> emitted fiemap.c: 203: emmitted ==> emitted transaction.h: 36: trasaction ==> transaction volumes.c: 5312: filesysmte ==> filesystem zoned.c: 1977: trasnsaction ==> transaction Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-09-03btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fdFilipe Manana1-0/+6
If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode's lock, triggering an assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes, while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the file's private to an on stack allocated private with the member 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there's a private structure associated to the file which has 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true, so it skips locking the inode's VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file's private to NULL since it had no prior private and our private was stack allocated. Then it unlocks the inode's VFS lock; 8) Task B enters btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(), then the assertion that checks the inode's VFS lock is held fails, since task B never locked it and task A has already unlocked it. The stack trace produced is the following: assertion failed: inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 9 PID: 5072 Comm: worker Tainted: G U OE 6.10.5-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 69f48d427608e1c09e60ea24c6c55e2ca1b049e8 Hardware name: Acer Predator PH315-52/Covini_CFS, BIOS V1.12 07/28/2020 RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs] Code: 50 d6 86 c0 e8 (...) RSP: 0018:ffff9e4a03dcfc78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff9078a9868e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff907dce4a7800 RDI: ffff907dce4a7800 RBP: ffff907805518800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9e4a03dcfb38 R10: ffff9e4a03dcfb30 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff907684ae7800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff90774646b600 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f04b96006c0(0000) GS:ffff907dce480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f32acbfc000 CR3: 00000001fd4fa005 CR4: 00000000003726f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x24 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] btrfs_sync_file+0x21a/0x4d0 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? __seccomp_filter+0x31d/0x4f0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 ? do_futex+0xcb/0x190 ? __x64_sys_futex+0x10e/0x1d0 ? switch_fpu_return+0x4f/0xd0 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Another problem here is if task B grabs the private pointer and then uses it after task A has finished, since the private was allocated in the stack of task A, it results in some invalid memory access with a hard to predict result. This issue, triggering the assertion, was observed with QEMU workloads by two users in the Link tags below. Fix this by not relying on a file's private to pass information to fsync that it should skip locking the inode and instead pass this information through a special value stored in current->journal_info. This is safe because in the relevant section of the direct IO write path we are not holding a transaction handle, so current->journal_info is NULL. The following C program triggers the issue: $ cat repro.c /* Get the O_DIRECT definition. */ #ifndef _GNU_SOURCE #define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <errno.h> #include <string.h> #include <pthread.h> static int fd; static ssize_t do_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count, off_t offset) { while (count > 0) { ssize_t ret; ret = pwrite(fd, buf, count, offset); if (ret < 0) { if (errno == EINTR) continue; return ret; } count -= ret; buf += ret; } return 0; } static void *fsync_loop(void *arg) { while (1) { int ret; ret = fsync(fd); if (ret != 0) { perror("Fsync failed"); exit(6); } } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { long pagesize; void *write_buf; pthread_t fsyncer; int ret; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Use: %s <file path>\n", argv[0]); return 1; } fd = open(argv[1], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_DIRECT, 0666); if (fd == -1) { perror("Failed to open/create file"); return 1; } pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); if (pagesize == -1) { perror("Failed to get page size"); return 2; } ret = posix_memalign(&write_buf, pagesize, pagesize); if (ret) { perror("Failed to allocate buffer"); return 3; } ret = pthread_create(&fsyncer, NULL, fsync_loop, NULL); if (ret != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Failed to create writer thread: %d\n", ret); return 4; } while (1) { ret = do_write(fd, write_buf, pagesize, 0); if (ret != 0) { perror("Write failed"); exit(5); } } return 0; } $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi $ mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi $ timeout 10 ./repro /mnt/sdi/foo Usually the race is triggered within less than 1 second. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Reported-by: Paulo Dias <paulo.miguel.dias@gmail.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219187 Reported-by: Andreas Jahn <jahn-andi@web.de> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219199 Reported-by: syzbot+4704b3cc972bd76024f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000044ff540620d7dee2@google.com/ Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: switch btrfs_pending_snapshot::dir to btrfs_inodeDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: add and use helper to commit the current transactionFilipe Manana1-0/+1
We have several places that attach to the current transaction with btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() and then commit the transaction if there is one. Add a helper and use it to deduplicate this pattern. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: rename macro local variables that clash with other variablesDavid Sterba1-3/+3
Fix variable names in two macros where there's a local function variable of the same name. In subpage_calc_start_bit() it's in several callers, in btrfs_abort_transaction() it's only in replace_file_extents(). Found by 'make W=2'. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: remove no longer used btrfs_transaction_in_commit()Filipe Manana1-1/+0
The function btrfs_transaction_in_commit() is no longer used, its last use was removed in commit 11aeb97b45ad ("btrfs: don't arbitrarily slow down delalloc if we're committing"), so just remove it. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: add forward declarations and headers, part 2David Sterba1-1/+16
Do a cleanup in more headers: - add forward declarations for types referenced by pointers - add includes when types need them This fixes potential compilation problems if the headers are reordered or the missing includes are not provided indirectly. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-12-06btrfs: free qgroup pertrans reserve on transaction abortBoris Burkov1-0/+3
If we abort a transaction, we never run the code that frees the pertrans qgroup reservation. This results in warnings on unmount as that reservation has been leaked. The leak isn't a huge issue since the fs is read-only, but it's better to clean it up when we know we can/should. Do it during the cleanup_transaction step of aborting. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: add and use helpers for reading and writing log_transidFilipe Manana1-1/+1
Currently the log_transid field of a root is always modified while holding the root's log_mutex locked. Most readers of a root's log_transid are also holding the root's log_mutex locked, however there is one exception which is btrfs_set_inode_last_trans() where we don't take the lock to avoid blocking several operations if log syncing is happening in parallel. Any races here should be harmless, and in the worst case they may cause a fsync to log an inode when it's not really needed, so nothing bad from a functional perspective. To avoid data race warnings from tools like KCSAN and other issues such as load and store tearing (amongst others, see [1]), create helpers to access the log_transid field of a root using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and use these helpers where needed. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/793253/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: move btrfs_defrag_root() to defrag.{c,h}Filipe Manana1-1/+0
The btrfs_defrag_root() function does not really belong in the transaction.{c,h} module and as we have a defrag.{c,h} nowadays, move it to there instead. This also allows to stop exporting btrfs_defrag_leaves(), so we can make it static. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ rename info to fs_info for consistency ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: rename errno identifiers to errorDavid Sterba1-7/+7
We sync the kernel files to userspace and the 'errno' symbol is defined by standard library, which does not matter in kernel but the parameters or local variables could clash. Rename them all. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: always reserve space for delayed refs when starting transactionFilipe Manana1-0/+2
When starting a transaction (or joining an existing one with btrfs_start_transaction()), we reserve space for the number of items we want to insert in a btree, but we don't do it for the delayed refs we will generate while using the transaction to modify (COW) extent buffers in a btree or allocate new extent buffers. Basically how it works: 1) When we start a transaction we reserve space for the number of items the caller wants to be inserted/modified/deleted in a btree. This space goes to the transaction block reserve; 2) If the delayed refs block reserve is not full, its size is greater than the amount of its reserved space, and the flush method is BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL, then we attempt to reserve more space for it corresponding to the number of items the caller wants to insert/modify/delete in a btree; 3) The size of the delayed refs block reserve is increased when a task creates delayed refs after COWing an extent buffer, allocating a new one or deleting (freeing) an extent buffer. This happens after the the task started or joined a transaction, whenever it calls btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv(); 4) The delayed refs block reserve is then refilled by anyone calling btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill(), either during unlink/truncate operations or when someone else calls btrfs_start_transaction() with a 0 number of items and flush method BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL; 5) As a task COWs or allocates extent buffers, it consumes space from the transaction block reserve. When the task releases its transaction handle (btrfs_end_transaction()) or it attempts to commit the transaction, it releases any remaining space in the transaction block reserve that it did not use, as not all space may have been used (due to pessimistic space calculation) by calling btrfs_block_rsv_release() which will try to add that unused space to the delayed refs block reserve (if its current size is greater than its reserved space). That transferred space may not be enough to completely fulfill the delayed refs block reserve. Plus we have some tasks that will attempt do modify as many leaves as they can before getting -ENOSPC (and then reserving more space and retrying), such as hole punching and extent cloning which call btrfs_replace_file_extents(). Such tasks can generate therefore a high number of delayed refs, for both metadata and data (we can't know in advance how many file extent items we will find in a range and therefore how many delayed refs for dropping references on data extents we will generate); 6) If a transaction starts its commit before the delayed refs block reserve is refilled, for example by the transaction kthread or by someone who called btrfs_join_transaction() before starting the commit, then when running delayed references if we don't have enough reserved space in the delayed refs block reserve, we will consume space from the global block reserve. Now this doesn't make a lot of sense because: 1) We should reserve space for delayed references when starting the transaction, since we have no guarantees the delayed refs block reserve will be refilled; 2) If no refill happens then we will consume from the global block reserve when running delayed refs during the transaction commit; 3) If we have a bunch of tasks calling btrfs_start_transaction() with a number of items greater than zero and at the time the delayed refs reserve is full, then we don't reserve any space at btrfs_start_transaction() for the delayed refs that will be generated by a task, and we can therefore end up using a lot of space from the global reserve when running the delayed refs during a transaction commit; 4) There are also other operations that result in bumping the size of the delayed refs reserve, such as creating and deleting block groups, as well as the need to update a block group item because we allocated or freed an extent from the respective block group; 5) If we have a significant gap between the delayed refs reserve's size and its reserved space, two very bad things may happen: 1) The reserved space of the global reserve may not be enough and we fail the transaction commit with -ENOSPC when running delayed refs; 2) If the available space in the global reserve is enough it may result in nearly exhausting it. If the fs has no more unallocated device space for allocating a new block group and all the available space in existing metadata block groups is not far from the global reserve's size before we started the transaction commit, we may end up in a situation where after the transaction commit we have too little available metadata space, and any future transaction commit will fail with -ENOSPC, because although we were able to reserve space to start the transaction, we were not able to commit it, as running delayed refs generates some more delayed refs (to update the extent tree for example) - this includes not even being able to commit a transaction that was started with the goal of unlinking a file, removing an empty data block group or doing reclaim/balance, so there's no way to release metadata space. In the worst case the next time we mount the filesystem we may also fail with -ENOSPC due to failure to commit a transaction to cleanup orphan inodes. This later case was reported and hit by someone running a SLE (SUSE Linux Enterprise) distribution for example - where the fs had no more unallocated space that could be used to allocate a new metadata block group, and the available metadata space was about 1.5M, not enough to commit a transaction to cleanup an orphan inode (or do relocation of data block groups that were far from being full). So improve on this situation by always reserving space for delayed refs when calling start_transaction(), and if the flush method is BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL, also try to refill the delayed refs block reserve if it's not full. The space reserved for the delayed refs is added to a local block reserve that is part of the transaction handle, and when a task updates the delayed refs block reserve size, after creating a delayed ref, the space is transferred from that local reserve to the global delayed refs reserve (fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv). In case the local reserve does not have enough space, which may happen for tasks that generate a variable and potentially large number of delayed refs (such as the hole punching and extent cloning cases mentioned before), we transfer any available space and then rely on the current behaviour of hoping some other task refills the delayed refs reserve or fallback to the global block reserve. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: stop doing excessive space reservation for csum deletionFilipe Manana1-0/+1
Currently when reserving space for deleting the csum items for a data extent, when adding or updating a delayed ref head, we determine how many leaves of csum items we can have and then pass that number to the helper btrfs_calc_delayed_ref_bytes(). This helper is used for calculating space for all tree modifications we need when running delayed references, however the amount of space it computes is excessive for deleting csum items because: 1) It uses btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size() which is excessive because we only need to delete csum items from the csum tree, we don't need to insert any items, so btrfs_calc_metadata_size() is all we need (as it computes space needed to delete an item); 2) If the free space tree is enabled, it doubles the amount of space, which is pointless for csum deletion since we don't need to touch the free space tree or any other tree other than the csum tree. So improve on this by tracking how many csum deletions we have and using a new helper to calculate space for csum deletions (just a wrapper around btrfs_calc_metadata_size() with a comment). This reduces the amount of space we need to reserve for csum deletions by a factor of 4, and it helps reduce the number of times we have to block space reservations and have the reclaim task enter the space flushing algorithm (flush delayed items, flush delayed refs, etc) in order to satisfy tickets. For example this results in a total time decrease when unlinking (or truncating) files with many extents, as we end up having to block on space metadata reservations less often. Example test: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nullb0 MNT=/mnt/test umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV # Use compression to quickly create files with a lot of extents # (each with a size of 128K). mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT # 100G gives at least 983040 extents with a size of 128K. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 1M 0 120G" $MNT/foobar # Flush all delalloc and clear all metadata from memory. umount $MNT mount -o compress=lzo $DEV $MNT start=$(date +%s%N) rm -f $MNT/foobar end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo "rm took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Before this change rm took: 7504 milliseconds After this change rm took: 6574 milliseconds (-12.4%) Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-04btrfs: always print transaction aborted messages with an error levelFilipe Manana1-2/+2
Commit b7af0635c87f ("btrfs: print transaction aborted messages with an error level") changed the log level of transaction aborted messages from a debug level to an error level, so that such messages are always visible even on production systems where the log level is normally above the debug level (and also on some syzbot reports). Later, commit fccf0c842ed4 ("btrfs: move btrfs_abort_transaction to transaction.c") changed the log level back to debug level when the error number for a transaction abort should not have a stack trace printed. This happened for absolutely no reason. It's always useful to print transaction abort messages with an error level, regardless of whether the error number should cause a stack trace or not. So change back the log level to error level. Fixes: fccf0c842ed4 ("btrfs: move btrfs_abort_transaction to transaction.c") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-09-08btrfs: do not block starts waiting on previous transaction commitJosef Bacik1-0/+1
Internally I got a report of very long stalls on normal operations like creating a new file when auto relocation was running. The reporter used the 'bpf offcputime' tracer to show that we would get stuck in start_transaction for 5 to 30 seconds, and were always being woken up by the transaction commit. Using my timing-everything script, which times how long a function takes and what percentage of that total time is taken up by its children, I saw several traces like this 1083 took 32812902424 ns 29929002926 ns 91.2110% wait_for_commit_duration 25568 ns 7.7920e-05% commit_fs_roots_duration 1007751 ns 0.00307% commit_cowonly_roots_duration 446855602 ns 1.36182% btrfs_run_delayed_refs_duration 271980 ns 0.00082% btrfs_run_delayed_items_duration 2008 ns 6.1195e-06% btrfs_apply_pending_changes_duration 9656 ns 2.9427e-05% switch_commit_roots_duration 1598 ns 4.8700e-06% btrfs_commit_device_sizes_duration 4314 ns 1.3147e-05% btrfs_free_log_root_tree_duration Here I was only tracing functions that happen where we are between START_COMMIT and UNBLOCKED in order to see what would be keeping us blocked for so long. The wait_for_commit() we do is where we wait for a previous transaction that hasn't completed it's commit. This can include all of the unpin work and other cleanups, which tends to be the longest part of our transaction commit. There is no reason we should be blocking new things from entering the transaction at this point, it just adds to random latency spikes for no reason. Fix this by adding a PREP stage. This allows us to properly deal with multiple committers coming in at the same time, we retain the behavior that the winner waits on the previous transaction and the losers all wait for this transaction commit to occur. Nothing else is blocked during the PREP stage, and then once the wait is complete we switch to COMMIT_START and all of the same behavior as before is maintained. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: don't hold an extra reference for redirtied buffersChristoph Hellwig1-3/+0
When btrfs_redirty_list_add redirties a buffer, it also acquires an extra reference that is released on transaction commit. But this is not required as buffers that are dirty or under writeback are never freed (look for calls to extent_buffer_under_io())). Remove the extra reference and the infrastructure used to drop it again. History behind redirty logic: In the first place, it used releasing_list to hold all the to-be-released extent buffers, and decided which buffers to re-dirty at the commit time. Then, in a later version, the behaviour got changed to re-dirty a necessary buffer and add re-dirtied one to the list in btrfs_free_tree_block(). In short, the list was there mostly for the patch series' historical reason. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [ add Naohiro's comment regarding history ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: move btrfs_abort_transaction to transaction.cJosef Bacik1-0/+31
While trying to sync messages.[ch] I ended up with this dependency on messages.h in the rest of btrfs-progs code base because it's where btrfs_abort_transaction() was now held. We want to keep messages.[ch] limited to the kernel code, and the btrfs_abort_transaction() code better fits in the transaction code and not in messages. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ move the __cold attributes ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: remove fs_info::pending_changes and related codeJosef Bacik1-1/+0
Now that we're not using this code anywhere we can remove it as well as the member from fs_info. We don't have any mount options or on/off features that would utilize the pending infrastructure, the last one was inode_cache. There was a patchset [1] to enable some features from sysfs that would break things if it would be set immediately. In case we'll need that kind of logic again the patch can be reverted, but for the current use it can be replaced by the single state bit to do the commit. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/1422609654-19519-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com/ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: convert __TRANS_* defines to enum bitsDavid Sterba1-8/+10
The base transaction bits can be defined as bits in a contiguous sequence, although right now there's a hole from bit 1 to 8. The bits are used for btrfs_trans_handle::type, and there's another set of TRANS_STATE_* defines that are for btrfs_transaction::state. They are mutually exclusive though the hole in the sequence looks like was made for the states. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move trans_handle_cachep out of ctree.hJosef Bacik1-0/+3
This is local to the transaction code, remove it from ctree.h and inode.c, create new helpers in the transaction to handle the init work and move the cachep locally to transaction.c. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info for deleting snapshots and cleanerJosef Bacik1-1/+1
We're passing a root around here, but we only really need the fs_info, so fix up btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot() to take an fs_info instead, and then fix up all the callers appropriately. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-02btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are doneJosef Bacik1-0/+1
We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file systems in production. I reproduced this locally by injecting errors into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time. This presented as an error while looking up an extent item WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8 RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000 R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0 __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200 ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0 ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50 ? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220 prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320 relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60 balance_kthread+0x35/0x50 ? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60 kthread+0x16b/0x190 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex. However if we had a pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a state where we have a half deleted snapshot. Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up the snapshot. Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that had a pending drop_progress key. If they do then we know we were in the middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info. Then balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again. If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the cleaner_mutex. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-31btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshotFilipe Manana1-0/+2
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot: 1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots; 2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list; 3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free. This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: remove trans_handle->rootJosef Bacik1-1/+0
Nobody is using this anymore, remove it. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: rework async transaction committingJosef Bacik1-1/+1
Currently we do this awful thing where we get another ref on a trans handle, async off that handle and commit the transaction from that work. Because we do this we have to mess with current->journal_info and the freeze counting stuff. We already have an async thing to kick for the transaction commit, the transaction kthread. Replace this work struct with a flag on the fs_info to tell the kthread to go ahead and commit even if it's before our timeout. Then we can drastically simplify the async transaction commit path. Note: this can be simplified and functionality based on the pending operation COMMIT. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> [ add note ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk arrayFilipe Manana1-1/+1
Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-07btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunksFilipe Manana1-7/+0
When a task attempting to allocate a new chunk verifies that there is not currently enough free space in the system space_info and there is another task that allocated a new system chunk but it did not finish yet the creation of the respective block group, it waits for that other task to finish creating the block group. This is to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array in the superblock, which is limited, when we have a thundering herd of tasks allocating new chunks. This problem was described and fixed by commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations"). However there are two very similar scenarios where this can lead to a deadlock: 1) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the respective system block group. However before task B ends its transaction handle and finishes the creation of the system block group, it attempts to allocate another chunk (like a data chunk for an fallocate operation for a very large range). Task B will be unable to progress and allocate the new chunk, because task A set space_info->chunk_alloc to 1 and therefore it loops at btrfs_chunk_alloc() waiting for task A to finish its chunk allocation and set space_info->chunk_alloc to 0, but task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the new system block group, therefore resulting in a deadlock; 2) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the respective system block group. By the time that task B enter the final phase of block group allocation, which happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it modifies the extent tree, the device tree or the chunk tree to insert the items for some new block group, it needs to allocate a new chunk, so it ends up at btrfs_chunk_alloc() and keeps looping there because task A has set space_info->chunk_alloc to 1, but task A is waiting for task B to finish creation of the new system block group and release the reserved system space, therefore resulting in a deadlock. In short, the problem is if a task B needs to allocate a new chunk after it previously allocated a new system chunk and if another task A is currently waiting for task B to complete the allocation of the new system chunk. Unfortunately this deadlock scenario introduced by the previous fix for the system chunk array exhaustion problem does not have a simple and short fix, and requires a big change to rework the chunk allocation code so that chunk btree updates are all made in the first phase of chunk allocation. And since this deadlock regression is being frequently hit on zoned filesystems and the