Merge branch 'bpf-fix-objects-stuck-in-free_by_rcu_ttrace'

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
bpf: Fix objects stuck in free_by_rcu_ttrace

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The objects that bpf_mem_alloc frees while RCU tasks trace GP is in flight
stay in free_by_rcu_ttrace list until the same bpf_mem_cache frees or
allocates in bulk again.

Patch 1 - refactoring. No functional change.
Patch 2 - the fix.
Patch 3 - selftest.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260930095920.601738-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 47 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 8a8f088e83e6..15684d0fc883 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -118,6 +118,11 @@ struct bpf_mem_cache {
 	struct llist_head free_by_rcu_ttrace;
 	struct llist_head waiting_for_gp_ttrace;
 	struct rcu_head rcu_ttrace;
+	/*
+	 * 0 - idle
+	 * 1 - __free_rcu() is queued
+	 * 2 - __free_rcu() is queued and free_by_rcu_ttrace got more objects since
+	 */
 	atomic_t call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress;
 	raw_spinlock_t lock;
 };
@@ -276,6 +281,8 @@ static int free_all(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, struct llist_node *llnode, bool per
 	return cnt;
 }
 
+static void __do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c);
+
 static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
 {
 	struct bpf_mem_cache *c = container_of(head, struct bpf_mem_cache, rcu_ttrace);
@@ -285,7 +292,19 @@ static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
 		llnode = llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace);
 
 	free_all(c, llnode, !!c->percpu_size);
-	atomic_set(&c->call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * do_call_rcu_ttrace() that ran while GP was in flight left its objects
+	 * in free_by_rcu_ttrace. This cache may never free or alloc in bulk
+	 * again, so start the next GP from here.
+	 * 'c' can be freed as soon as call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress is zero.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&c->call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress, 1, 0) == 1)
+		return;
+
+	/* Pairs with synchronize_rcu() in free_mem_alloc() */
+	guard(rcu)();
+	__do_call_rcu_ttrace(c);
 }
 
 static void enque_to_free(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj)
@@ -298,18 +317,15 @@ static void enque_to_free(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj)
 	llist_add(llnode, &c->free_by_rcu_ttrace);
 }
 
-static void do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
+static void __do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
 {
 	struct llist_node *llnode, *t;
 
-	if (atomic_xchg(&c->call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress, 1)) {
-		if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(c->draining))) {
-			scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &c->lock)
-				llnode = llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu_ttrace);
-			free_all(c, llnode, !!c->percpu_size);
-		}
-		return;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Must be done before llist_del_all(). Objects that it misses were
+	 * added by do_call_rcu_ttrace() that will set 2 after this store.
+	 */
+	atomic_set(&c->call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress, 1);
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!llist_empty(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace));
 	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu_ttrace))
@@ -328,6 +344,22 @@ static void do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
 	call_rcu_tasks_trace(&c->rcu_ttrace, __free_rcu);
 }
 
+static void do_call_rcu_ttrace(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
+{
+	struct llist_node *llnode;
+
+	if (atomic_xchg(&c->call_rcu_ttrace_in_progress, 2)) {
+		if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(c->draining))) {
+			scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &c->lock)
+				llnode = llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu_ttrace);
+			free_all(c, llnode, !!c->percpu_size);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
+	__do_call_rcu_ttrace(c);
+}
+
 static void free_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
 {
 	struct bpf_mem_cache *tgt = c->tgt;
@@ -700,7 +732,12 @@ static void free_mem_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
 	 * to wait for the pending __free_by_rcu(), and __free_rcu(). RCU Tasks
 	 * Trace grace period implies RCU grace period, so all __free_rcu don't
 	 * need extra call_rcu() (and thus extra rcu_barrier() here).
+	 *
+	 * __free_rcu() queues itself again unless it sees 'draining'. After
+	 * synchronize_rcu() it either did that already or will not do it, so
+	 * rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() cannot miss it.
 	 */
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	rcu_barrier(); /* wait for __free_by_rcu */
 	rcu_barrier_tasks_trace(); /* wait for __free_rcu */
 	free_mem_alloc_no_barrier(ma);