aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>2026-10-02 12:08:30 +0200
committerRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>2026-10-05 17:47:45 -0400
commitcf238c067eaae1cbfb00738e29219b9568d2313e (patch)
tree9b526cb64031c1c4e1c65297b0dc08a69b4a2682 /drivers
parent83d5acca1f4f6132038ea88c72c5844f62e42d44 (diff)
drm/xe: Fix stale pinned_link entry when fb-pin performs the final unpin
xe_bo_pin_external() and xe_bo_unpin_external() maintain the bo's pinned_link list membership in xe->pinned.late.external, based on whether the current call is the outermost pin or the final unpin. However, the same external bo's pin_count can also be raised and lowered directly by __xe_pin_fb_vma()/__xe_unpin_fb_vma(), which pin the bo as a display scanout buffer without going through xe_bo_pin_external()/xe_bo_unpin_external() at all, and have no notion of, or ownership over, pinned_link. If a bo is pinned both externally (e.g. dma-buf export) and as an fb, and the external unpin happens first, xe_bo_unpin_external() correctly observes pin_count > 1 and leaves the bo on pinned_link. When the fb unpin later performs the true last unpin (pin_count 1 -> 0), it never touches pinned_link, leaving the bo linked on xe->pinned.late.external indefinitely. Once the bo is subsequently freed, this stale list entry points into freed memory, corrupting the list and risking a use-after-free the next time the list is walked or spliced. The backup object pin/unpin sites in xe_bo_notifier_prepare_pinned()/ xe_bo_notifier_unprepare_pinned() have the same bypass characteristic, though they never add their bo to a pinned list, so are not affected by this particular list-corruption issue. Move the pinned_link removal into xe_bo_account_unpin(), which already runs on every unpin path (kernel, external, framebuffer, backup object) right before the true 1 -> 0 pin_count transition. Since list_del_init() only operates on the node itself, this removal is list-agnostic and safe to perform regardless of which list (external or kernel_bo_present) the bo happens to be linked on, or which code path is performing the final unpin. Drop the now-redundant explicit list_del_init() calls in xe_bo_unpin_external() and xe_bo_unpin(). v2: - New patch v3: - Rebased on changes to previous patch. Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support") Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+ Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com> Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261002100830.12297-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit ca58d36a1f93af586ee93b340c9f9fd81312cc01) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c25
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index f85d5f9b5fce..7b95ce0445a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -495,12 +495,27 @@ static void xe_bo_account_pin(struct xe_bo *bo)
* ttm_bo_unpin(), so that the check against the true 1->0 transition sees
* the pin count that is about to be released. See xe_bo_account_pin() for
* why imported bos are excluded.
+ *
+ * On the true last unpin, also removes @bo from whichever pinned-bo list
+ * (external or kernel_bo_present) it may currently be linked on, since a
+ * bo's final unpin can happen through a pin path (e.g. framebuffer,
+ * backup object) that has no notion of, or ownership over, that list.
+ * This is safe and list-agnostic: list_del_init() only needs the node
+ * itself, not knowledge of which list it is threaded through, and is a
+ * no-op if @bo is not linked.
*/
static void xe_bo_account_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo)
{
struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
+ bool last_unpin = bo->ttm.pin_count == 1;
- if (bo->ttm.pin_count == 1 && bo->ttm.ttm && ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm.ttm) &&
+ if (last_unpin && !list_empty(&bo->pinned_link)) {
+ spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock);
+ list_del_init(&bo->pinned_link);
+ spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock);
+ }
+
+ if (last_unpin && bo->ttm.ttm && ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm.ttm) &&
!xe_ttm_bo_is_imported(&bo->ttm))
xe_ttm_tt_account_add(xe, bo->ttm.ttm);
}
@@ -3315,11 +3330,6 @@ void xe_bo_unpin_external(struct xe_bo *bo)
xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_pinned(bo));
xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_user(bo));
- spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock);
- if (bo->ttm.pin_count == 1 && !list_empty(&bo->pinned_link))
- list_del_init(&bo->pinned_link);
- spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock);
-
xe_bo_unpin_account(bo);
/*
@@ -3338,10 +3348,7 @@ void xe_bo_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo)
xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_pinned(bo));
if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) || bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT) {
- spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock);
xe_assert(xe, !list_empty(&bo->pinned_link));
- list_del_init(&bo->pinned_link);
- spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock);
if (bo->backup_obj) {
if (xe_bo_is_pinned(bo->backup_obj))