diff options
| author | Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> | 2025-09-05 16:56:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> | 2025-09-11 09:45:35 -0700 |
| commit | 88434448438e4302e272b2a2b810b42e05ea024b (patch) | |
| tree | 70ef0d1004f6590a87b1b054c9688bb63e6b3099 /drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi | |
| parent | 95c1cfa306087142989bff34ea0e05dcd95ddc58 (diff) | |
drm/xe/guc: Set RCS/CCS yield policy
All recent platforms (including all the ones officially supported by the
Xe driver) do not allow concurrent execution of RCS and CCS workloads
from different address spaces, with the HW blocking the context switch
when it detects such a scenario.
The DUAL_QUEUE flag helps with this, by causing the GuC to not submit a
context it knows will not be able to execute. This, however, causes a new
problem: if RCS and CCS queues have pending workloads from different
address spaces, the GuC needs to choose from which of the 2 queues to
pick the next workload to execute. By default, the GuC prioritizes RCS
submissions over CCS ones, which can lead to CCS workloads being
significantly (or completely) starved of execution time.
The driver can tune this by setting a dedicated scheduling policy KLV;
this KLV allows the driver to specify a quantum (in ms) and a ratio
(percentage value between 0 and 100), and the GuC will prioritize the CCS
for that percentage of each quantum.
Given that we want to guarantee enough RCS throughput to avoid missing
frames, we set the yield policy to 20% of each 80ms interval.
v2: updated quantum and ratio, improved comment, use xe_guc_submit_disable
in gt_sanitize
Fixes: d9a1ae0d17bd ("drm/xe/guc: Enable WA_DUAL_QUEUE for newer platforms")
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Tested-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250905235632.3333247-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h | 25 |
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h index d8cf68a0516d..1baa969aaa7c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ enum xe_guc_action { XE_GUC_ACTION_ENTER_S_STATE = 0x501, XE_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE = 0x502, XE_GUC_ACTION_GLOBAL_SCHED_POLICY_CHANGE = 0x506, + XE_GUC_ACTION_UPDATE_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_KLV = 0x509, XE_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT = 0x1000, XE_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET = 0x1001, XE_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_DONE = 0x1002, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h index 0e78351c6ef5..265a135e7061 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_klvs_abi.h @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ * | 0 | 31:16 | **KEY** - KLV key identifier | * | | | - `GuC Self Config KLVs`_ | * | | | - `GuC Opt In Feature KLVs`_ | + * | | | - `GuC Scheduling Policies KLVs`_ | * | | | - `GuC VGT Policy KLVs`_ | * | | | - `GuC VF Configuration KLVs`_ | * | | | | @@ -153,6 +154,30 @@ enum { #define GUC_KLV_OPT_IN_FEATURE_DYNAMIC_INHIBIT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_LEN 0u /** + * DOC: GuC Scheduling Policies KLVs + * + * `GuC KLV`_ keys available for use with UPDATE_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_KLV. + * + * _`GUC_KLV_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_RENDER_COMPUTE_YIELD` : 0x1001 + * Some platforms do not allow concurrent execution of RCS and CCS + * workloads from different address spaces. By default, the GuC prioritizes + * RCS submissions over CCS ones, which can lead to CCS workloads being + * significantly (or completely) starved of execution time. This KLV allows + * the driver to specify a quantum (in ms) and a ratio (percentage value + * between 0 and 100), and the GuC will prioritize the CCS for that + * percentage of each quantum. For example, specifying 100ms and 30% will + * make the GuC prioritize the CCS for 30ms of every 100ms. + * Note that this does not necessarly mean that RCS and CCS engines will + * only be active for their percentage of the quantum, as the restriction + * only kicks in if both classes are fully busy with non-compatible address + * spaces; i.e., if one engine is idle or running the same address space, + * a pending job on the other engine will still be submitted to the HW no + * matter what the ratio is + */ +#define GUC_KLV_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_RENDER_COMPUTE_YIELD_KEY 0x1001 +#define GUC_KLV_SCHEDULING_POLICIES_RENDER_COMPUTE_YIELD_LEN 2u + +/** * DOC: GuC VGT Policy KLVs * * `GuC KLV`_ keys available for use with PF2GUC_UPDATE_VGT_POLICY. |
